With the entertainment industry experiencing a shift from traditional paid TV services to streaming networks, production companies are trying everything they can to stay afloat. After three years of negotiations, media giants CBS and Viacom have finally reached a merger decision making them more competitive in a continuously changing industry. The mega-deal has been a long-term dream for vice chairwoman, Shari Redstone and results in combined company value of over $30 billion.

ViacomCBS’s portfolio will include CBS, MTV, Showtime, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, Paramount Pictures, local tv stations, and international networks in Argentina, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The company will also control production units that create content for outside streaming parties like Amazon and Netflix. Past examples of these kinds of exchanges include CBS producing Dead to Me for Netflix and Viacom’s Paramount Pictures producing Jack Reacher for Amazon. Advertising revenues alone will ring in at about $11 billion, giving the company the upper hand in future negotiations with distributors.

Looking at why now, likely factors include Netflix’s growing 151 million subscribers, Disney and AT&T’s recent acquisitions activities, and the increase in network streaming services overall. Each company is only getting bigger, making the ViacomCBS merger seem like one of their only options to continue contending. Experts predict that the cost of owning and producing content is going to keep increasing making future mergers even more likely.

Although this specific merger took three proposals for the agreement to go through, shareholders on both sides seem to be supportive of the terms. Determining the right conditions for a deal takes time and trial, which allows both parties to find an agreement that satisfies all stakeholders. The last obstacle for ViacomCBS was the share price which board members worked overtime to agree upon, settling on giving 0.59625 CBS shares for each Viacom share.

For customers, the merger seems to be positive news as there will be an increased content library on both sides, and ViacomCBS will offer a variety of free and paid options on its platforms. Overall the entertainment industry will be one to watch as the consolidation of companies is expected to continue.

Talley LLP understands the challenges facing entrepreneurs with generating and protecting income. Whether you’re looking to improve your profitability or build your brand through a business transaction or capital raise, Talley is the consulting and financial services firm dedicated to strategic business solutions that deliver meaningful results.

In the past two years, large cities and tourist hot spots have been exposed to the growing micro-mobility services industry including electric scooters, bikes, and mopeds. Bird, Lime, Spin, Scoot, Skip, Jump, and Motivate remain the biggest names in the business, with several other smaller brands popping up on a more local scale. With differentiation being minimal, many believe that the industry only has room to shrink, particularly as more prominent names like Uber and Lyft begin to invest. In line with this theory, this week, the industry leader Bird announced its acquisition of competitor Scoot valued at $71.5 million but selling at an under value estimated price tag of $25 million.

Although Bird is the powerhouse of the industry founded in 2017, and now operating in 100+ cities worldwide, the number of competitors continues to be the biggest challenge for all groups involved. Scoot, on the other hand, has functioned on a much smaller scale since 2012, only operating in San Francisco, Barcelona, and Chile. San Francisco rejected a Bird permit bid to operate in the city about a year ago, so this new deal will ultimately allow Bird to get its foot in the previously closed door. The addition of Scoot’s mopeds and scooters will also grow the Bird range of vehicles even more after the introduction of its Bird Cruiser, or e-bike/ e-scooter crossover, from earlier this year.

Many may not realize that San Francisco’s initial denial is not uncommon, as many cities feel the electric transportation devices can cause more harm than good. This additional threat to existing companies comes from several problems including damage and theft of fleets, irresponsible use by riders, annoyed residents, pollution, and the risk of public transportation obsolescence. Overall, the Bird acquisition of Scoot may just be the beginning of the industry’s consolidation. It will be interesting to watch which bigger players will buy out smaller sized firms in the coming years. Ultimately, industry specialists believe that many of these micro-mobility companies may finally be able to turn a profit if this is the case.

Talley LLP understands the challenges facing entrepreneurs with generating and protecting income. Whether you’re looking to improve your profitability or build your brand through a business transaction or capital raise, Talley is the premier consulting and financial services firm dedicated to strategic business solutions that deliver meaningful results.

Each year as February 14th rolls around, individuals are looking for the perfect gift for their significant other, friend, family member, or themselves. According to the National Retail Federation, the jewelry business was expected to sell over $3.9 billion worth of product. With so many options as to where to buy and who to work with, purchasing a piece of jewelry can mirror high level business matters such as transitioning your company through an M&A deal. In both cases, there are two important ways a trusted advisor can help you navigate these complex financial transactions and find a deal that you love.

Understanding the marketplace. Whether you’re looking for a simple everyday piece or trying to find the right engagement ring, you may or may not have a general idea of your desired quality and price. In jewelry, most buyers, especially first-timers, head to retail stores and try to go through the whole process themselves. By doing this, they risk missing out on better quality items and a better maximization of their budget. A private jeweler may sound intimidating, but these advisors offer direct private assistance and a wealth of knowledge on the market.  Similarly, M&A advisors level the playing field for entrepreneurs by understanding the rules of engagement and developing the right strategy to buy or sell their companies. These experts help you identify investors, strategic and financial, that are a good fit to fuel business growth and can ultimately secure a better end-result than if you went it alone.

Protecting your investment. Private jewelers offer more than a one-time buyer-seller relationship. Many will be able to assist your jewelry purchases for years to come and help you solve any problems with those pieces that may arise in the future. Although working with an expert might seem expensive, the benefits outweigh the cost when considering the complex nature of the industry. An M&A advisor also helps you manage your investments and protects your best interests. Working side by side with management, advisors confirm that your buy or sell-side acquisition criteria are clearly defined, executable and measurable against future results to determine whether adjustments are needed. They help create a win-win situation for each party and optimize a successful outcome.

Whether in a new jewelry purchase or an M&A transaction, every negotiation is unique and needs to be approached with the proper strategy and insight. Talley LLP is uniquely equipped to provide the technical and managerial expertise to help you plan, negotiate, structure and execute on your buy-side or sell-side strategy.

Celebrities and their reps consider many angles when structuring compensation for a project. If you’re considering the sale or acquisition of a company, you should do the same. Why? Because it is not only what but how you present your assets to the other party, along with the terms for which you negotiate a transaction, that can make all the difference. See what these stars did that worked.
Sylvester Stallone Insisted on More Than Money – Stallone wrote Rocky but allegedly refused to sell the script until he was allowed to star in the film. As an unknown actor at the time this was pretty risky, but it all came down to what he ultimately wanted from the deal. Instead of achieving success as a storyteller alone, he built a longstanding career as a blockbuster action star. Deal Tip: Consider what you want to get out of a deal, financially and otherwise. Are you looking to retire with a comfortable nest egg? Expand your service line? Know your real motivations.
Sandra Bullock Leveraged Her Market Success – Coming off her Oscar win and box-office success from the Blind Side (an actor’s EBITDA equivalent), Bullock allegedly negotiated a deal that included $20 million first and then an additional 15 percent of first-dollar gross for Gravity. The film took in an estimated $723 million in world box office sales, that potentially netted the star another $70 million. Deal Tip: When coming to the table, consider tangibles and intangibles such as brand power, client lists, in-house talent, market share, industry trends, proprietary processes and more.
Cameron Diaz Took Less Up Front for a Bigger Payout Later – For her role in the little-remembered but profitable film Bad Teacher, Cameron Diaz agreed to accept much less than she would normally command. She took $1 million up front in return for a percentage of box office sales, which ended up bringing her $42 million. Deal Tip: Factor in your needs and tax situation before structuring a lump sum payment, distribution over time, partial ownership or other option.
Van Halen Put the Devil in the Details -Legend has it that should Van Halen have found even one brown M&M backstage in a bowl required by contract, he could legally cancel a scheduled appearance. As the rockstar explains here, the line-item stipulation (no brown M&Ms) was inserted deep into contracts to ensure promoters were reading them closely and therefore clear about the extensive physical requirements and safety measures needed for such a colossal show. Deal Tip: Go over “details” such as the future roles of company staff and other points that could make a smoother transition.
Celebrities wouldn’t think of going it alone in the complex deal process, and you don’t have to, either. Experts like those at Talley LLP who’ve negotiated hundreds of M&A transactions can help you make the most of a transaction based on your goals and priorities. 

General Electric recently announced the company would spin off its health-care business and unload its ownership in Baker Hughes, an oil services company, as part of a restructuring that will transform the corporate giant. GE’s CEO John Flannery could gain some insight on how these types of moves can play out by giving former Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman a call.

In the corporate world, breakups are common but don’t always go as planned.

When HP, then with $100 billion in revenue, underwent its massive breakup, it was a smaller, tech version of GE. It was involved in nearly every part of the tech business: PCs, printers, servers, supercomputers, software, storage, networking, services and other businesses. But in 2014, the then-struggling giant was faced with questions of what business it was really in and decided to split itself in half.

The theory behind HP’s restructuring was that its PCs and printer businesses, separated into HP Inc., would focus on generating cash instead of growth, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise, consisting of HP’s software and services, would be the growth business. However, after the dust settled on the spin-off, the two businesses found themselves on opposite paths.

Today, HP Inc.’s market cap is about $37.2 billion, while HP Enterprise has a market value of about $22.8 billion. HP Enterprise has continued to struggle since the breakup, only recently starting to show signs of improvement. In contrast, HP Inc. has shown both signs of innovation and growth, such as its efforts in 3D printing and pulling its printer business out of a slump.

Meanwhile at GE, fresh off being removed from the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Flannery is proceeding to put the company through a major overhaul, including selling off assets. Flannery plans to focus the core GE on aviation, power and renewable energy. While spinning out healthcare and getting out of oil could potentially help cut GE’s debt load, the company should be prepared for unforeseen challenges and opportunities along the way.

Talley LLP understands the challenges facing entrepreneurs with generating and protecting income. Whether you’re looking to improve your profitability or build your brand through a business transaction or capital raise, Talley is the premier consulting and financial services firm dedicated to strategic business solutions that deliver meaningful results.

As fans of the hit show “Shark Tank” can attest, it’s not easy securing funding for your small business.  Since debuting in August of 2009, millions of viewers have watched entrepreneurs try to convince one of the five “sharks” to invest in their business, not just financially but also with advice for long-term growth.  To quote head-“shark” Kevin O’Leary, “Building fast-growing, globally competitive companies is tough.”

In each episode small business owners make their pitch to the five sharks, all well-known millionaires who started out as entrepreneurs themselves, including Mark Cuban (entrepreneur/owner of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks) and Daymond John (founder of the FUBU clothing line), to convince at least one of them to invest their money and time.  But that isn’t easy.  Like all investors, the “sharks” have heard it all – from failures like the Life Caps Survival Pill (a vitamin and mineral pill that allows you to live without food for up to two weeks) to successes such as Ava the Elephant (an effective medicine dropper for children). Many contestants on the show get eaten alive by the “sharks” for the same reasons entrepreneurs outside of the reality TV show, by not having their financials in order or having a well-thought-out business plan.  As one “shark” put it, “Just because you have a hobby, doesn’t mean you have a business.”  This is a reality show that really is, well, real.

Whether you’re appearing on “Shark Tank”, seeking angel investors, or acquiring financing, you’ll need to do your research and be prepared. Talley LLP can assist you throughout the entire process.  From reviewing and preparing financial statements in a way that interests potential buyers/investors, to uncovering value from areas financials alone won’t reveal, the experts at Talley are here to help your business ventures succeed.

Disney on Thursday announced that it is buying a huge chunk of 21st Century Fox in a deal that promises to reshape the media industry and help the entertainment giant fend off digital rivals such as Netflix. The $52.4 billion deal will combine two of Hollywood’s biggest juggernauts.

As part of the transaction, Disney is also acquiring cable channels FX, National Geographic, and get Fox’s stakes in Hulu and European pay-TV provider Sky.

Prior to the deal closing, 21st Century Fox will separate the Fox broadcasting network, Fox News Channel, Fox Business Network, and some national sports networks into a new company that will be spun off to its shareholders. The remaining properties would ideally in the coming years merge with News Corp., from which they split in 2013, Fox’s Rupert Murdoch said on Fox Business Thursday morning.

Disney, which counts ESPN among its crown jewels, has suffered as consumers switch off their TVs and spend more hours watching streaming services such as Netflix that are distributed directly to consumers.

The deal allows Disney to expand its content, especially for streaming services. In addition to a majority stake in Hulu that it will have once the deal closes, Disney is preparing to launch two separate streaming services, one for sports and another focusing on entertainment. And it is pulling its content from Netflix in preparation for the launch. Adding Fox’s television and movie studios and the content they own means adding to the stable of must-watch content it can offer directly to consumers, bypassing their streaming competitors’ platforms.

The deal will need to undergo regulatory review and will likely take at least a year to close.

Talley LLP understands the challenges facing entrepreneurs with generating and protecting income. Whether you’re looking to improve your profitability or build your brand through a business transaction or capital raise, Talley is the consulting and financial services firm dedicated to strategic business solutions that deliver meaningful results.

 

Source: www.cnn.com 12/15/17

It was already a rough year for Steely Dan fans: Walter Becker, the band’s co-founder and guitarist, died in early September. Now the surviving member, Donald Fagen, is embroiled in a complicated legal feud with Becker’s estate.

At the center of the suit is a buy/sell agreement signed in 1972, the year the band formed, which stated that upon the death or departure of a Steely Dan bandmember, the group would purchase that member’s shares. By 1975 Steely Dan was effectively a duo, with Becker and Fagen accompanied by session musicians.

Fagen’s suit is apparently an effort to head off a move from Becker’s estate: He alleges that four days after Becker’s death from esophageal cancer on September 3, he received a letter that said: “We wanted to put you on notice that the Buy/Sell Agreement dated as of October 31, 1972 is of no force or effect.” The letter also reportedly demanded that Becker’s widow, Delia, be appointed a director or officer of the group, and that she was entitled to 50 percent ownership of Steely Dan.

The buy/sell agreement, if enforceable, would entitle Fagen to purchase Becker’s 50% ownership of the band and, therefore, be the sole owner and retain 100% control of the band. While Becker’s estate says the suit is “riddled with half-truths and omissions,” and regardless of the ultimate outcome of this dispute, there is a lesson both aspiring bands and entrepreneurs can learn from this story:

Estate/Legacy Plans Need To Be Updated Frequently. The buy/sell agreement in question in the Steely Dan lawsuit was apparently executed just before the release of their first album. In other words, it was done when Steely Dan was relatively unknown and had not achieved international success or amassed such a large catalog of music and other properties and rights. At the time, it was a fairly forward-thinking move (most bands have no agreements in place when they first start out). The problem is, however, it was never updated. The structure and governing documents through which a band (or any organization) operates need to be treated as a plan that can and will evolve over time as the band itself evolves. A legacy plan requires continual oversight and must be proactively implemented on an ongoing basis to truly work in the best interest of all parties involved. Bottom line: having an agreement that is 45 years old still govern any type of relationship is usually not a good idea.

Talley LLP understands the challenges facing entrepreneurs with generating and protecting income. Whether you’re looking to improve your profitability or build your brand through a business transaction or capital raise, Talley is the consulting and financial services firm dedicated to strategic business solutions that deliver meaningful results.

Players like Lebron James are renowned for their smart decisions when it comes to their money, whereas others like Allen Iverson serve as a cautionary tale. Over the course of his career, Iverson earned approximately $200 million: $155m from his NBA salary and another $40-$50m in endorsements. His lavish lifestyle during his NBA career foreshadowed the financial woes we would experience during his retirement.

How did Iverson manage to go broke?

Aside from showering his entourage with gifts he couldn’t afford and including them in a lifestyle fit for a king, Iverson apparently had a habit of keeping his money in dozens and dozens of garbage bags around his mansion. Some would occasionally go missing. At one point in his career, Iverson arrived back at an airport and had forgotten where he parked his car. Rather than spend time searching the parking lot for his vehicle, he simply found a ride home and bought a new one.

Allen’s financial situation came to light in 2012 after a judge in the state of Georgia ordered him to pay $900,000 to a jeweler. In a December 2012 court filing, Iverson told the judge that his monthly income was $62,500 and his expenses were $360,000. According to the court filing, Iverson monthly expenses consisted of such notable items as $125,000 going to various creditors and mortgages, $10,000 on clothes, $10,000 on restaurants/entertainment and $10,000 on groceries.

So how has Reebok helped Iverson?

Iverson made a decision in 2001 that would inevitably save him from his future self. He signed a unique endorsement deal with Reebok. In addition to paying $800,000 a year for life, Reebok set aside $32 million in a trust fund that Allen will not be able to access until he turns 55 in the year 2030. The deal came to light when Allen’s ex-wife filed for divorce.

Regardless if it is a challenge for Iverson to live with a budget far less than what he was used to during his playing days, someone had the foresight to protect the man from himself.

Whether an endorsement contract or an M&A transaction, every negotiation is unique and needs to be approached with the proper strategy and insight. Talley LLP is uniquely equipped to provide the technical and managerial expertise to help you plan, negotiate, structure and execute on your buy-side or sell-side strategy.

Depending on where you call home, you may have noticed Amazon’s fleet of plain white trucks delivering packages around town.  Amazon is experimenting with a new delivery service intended to make more products available for free two-day delivery and relieve overcrowding in its warehouses, which will push the online retailer deeper into functions handled by longtime partners UPS and FedEx.

Amazon will oversee pickup of packages from warehouses of third-party merchants selling goods on Amazon.com and their delivery to customers’ homes, cutting into the work that is now often handled by UPS and FedEx. Amazon could still use these couriers for delivery, but the company will decide how a package is sent instead of leaving it up to the seller.

The project underscores Amazon’s ambitions to expand its logistics operations and wean itself off the delivery networks of UPS and FedEx. A rush of last-minute holiday orders in 2013 forced Amazon to issue refunds to shoppers who didn’t get gifts in time, highlighting the perils of being overly dependent on partners for an integral component of its business pledge — quick, reliable delivery. Taking over some responsibility for delivery enables Amazon to protect that edge as rivals like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. enhance their own delivery operations.

Amazon’s latest move should not surprise many, as the company has demonstrated its ability to disrupt industries time and time again.

With over 25 years’ experience consulting with industry-leading companies, Talley understands the challenges facing entrepreneurs with generating and protecting income. Whether you’re looking to improve your profitability, build your brand through a business transaction or capital raise, Talley is the consulting and financial services firm dedicated to strategic business solutions that deliver meaningful results.


1 2 3
Archives