| Employees Vs. Independent Contractors Almost every business owner running a growing company is swamped with a to-do list a mile long. It is just part of the game. There may be so many things to worry about that an independent contractor's (IC) work status is not a priority. As a business grows, an oft-used method of acquiring help is to hire part- or full-time workers as ICs. This can be a good way to obtain help without the obligation of a long-term employment contract. Also, classifying a worker as an IC allows the employer to avoid various costs and paperwork requirements that come along with having employees. However, for many companies, the use of ICs actually represents a huge potential tax liability if the workers fail to pass IRS "employee vs. IC" tests. Some companies, after using ICs on a long-term basis, are reviewed by the IRS and found to have been in violation of "employee vs. IC" rules. Those companies end up having to make up a myriad of back taxes and penalties. These "employee vs. IC" tests look how your ICs actually perform their work, as well as how they are trained and compensated. The tests, will help you determine whether that IC you are using should really be classified as an employee. Every company using ICs should review each worker's situation to ensure they would actually qualify as ICs in the eyes of the IRS. To assist you to this end, we have compiled two lists of characteristics the IRS considers when classifying a worker as an employee or as an IC. Take a few minutes to review these lists with respect to each of your ICs to determine if you are treating them in accordance to IRS rules. We must note that these lists are by no means comprehensive. However, they will serve as a good start. If you have further questions on this issue, contact our offices. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOREMPLOYEE
ARTICLE TAKEN FROM DECEMBER 2004 ISSUE OF PROFIT ABILITY ( VIEW NEWSLETTER | SUBSCRIBE ) |



